A few weeks ago, The Rev. Fr. Cutie, the most famous Latino Roman Catholic priest in the world, was received as an Episcopalian. In a year, he will be consecrated as a presbyter in the Church of God, Anglican division. Apparently, he’d been thinking about the switchover for about two years. About the time he met his fiancée.
Is it a scandal? Changing religions isn’t anything new. Luther changed the order after being irked by Italian impiety. Soon after, The English King and a handful of other skeptical types reformatted the faith, offering a freedom from the imperial church, who seemed to be opposed to good times and making money for anyone else except its own cardinals.
So the story is old hat in some ways. Changing the faith has been done for a while. If you aren’t forced to do it by the sword, maybe there’s another church that will make you richer and put you in with the right crowd.
Denominational fluidity has especially been a hallmark of our American Culture. It’s more about who’s parties you like than the distinctions between who is getting saved and who isn’t. Fortunately, when we do make a decision, we all think we’re in the right church.
For a variety of reasons, Roman Catholics find it harder to switch. It’s not because most actually believe that the pope is the best dressed guy in the world, or that the RC church has the stairs to the kingdom in some Vatican back alley. It’s a family, and nobody wants to abandon the family. To leave out of personal convenience seems tawdry. Sometimes we don’t agree with everything our mom says, but we don’t go and get a mother who believes everything we do. We don’t go sleeping around with a bunch of younger, sexier religions just because our partners are getting a little dowdy. It’s for life.
Yet, it happens a lot. Catholic priest wants to get laid. He is called by God to be a priest. And he thinks that Episcopalians are Catholic enough. So again, the Roman Catholic church has lost a guy who couldn’t remain in the church because he liked an adult women. And he’s hot. Salt in the wound.
It’s an old story.
The real reason this is interesting is not the conversion. What’s wild is that he is a a celebrity. How many Episcopal priests have a TV show that’s not cable access? Most of the hand wringing isn’t because he’s moved over, but because the media does what it always does: compress time and space so that everyone is shocked and left feeling a bit bruised. Modernity allows us to create our own identity, to seek truth apart from culture. Postmodernism just speeds it up a hundred times.
More interesting, he chose the Episcopal Church. It would have made more sense to some if he had become Pentecostal, which is growing immenselyin the Latino Community. Instead, he joined a church whose roots are not in Latin America but in the British Isles, a church that was once called the “Republican Party at prayer,” had FDR and Thurgood Marshall as members, and has ordained a gay bishop.
How was this possible? He chose the church for theological reasons. His faith delinked and unmoored from cultural identity. If it had only been sex he could have stayed Roman and remained a layperson. But his cultural identity as a Roman Catholic was challenged by the cultural hegemony of American Protestantism, although in fairness there is a small Episcopal community in Cuba.
Perhaps what has happened is that he represents the continued alteration of European-American culture by the Latino community. America, by making religion another commodity in the spiritual marketplace, will unmoor Latinos them from their own geography and traditions. Like most Americans, Latinos will find it easier to choose whatever faith suits them. Cutie chose the Episcopal Church.
I suspect, however, this will not be a one way change. That one can choose a faith demonstrates the cultural power of capital. What will also change is the Episcopal Church. I’m not sure if he will be eating cucumber sandwiches and drinking Gin and Tonics at our garden parties. Instead, we Episcopalians will be serving beans and rice and drinking Mojitos. Not a bad change for us. Let’s welcome it.
Comments
I don't think The Episcopal
I don't think The Episcopal Church (TEC) can use Fr. Cutie for its marketing purposes. When Fr. Cutie left the Roman Catholic Church (RCC), his popularity has faded among the Latinos. Let us admit it that Catholic priests, in spite of the recent scandals, are more admired by more people (especially ladies), Catholics and non-Catholics alike, than Protestant ministers. After several years, when RCC problems have been solved and the scandals long forgotten by the people, most likely the RCC priests will regain their high popularity. The RCC priesthood has a more admirable history than the Episcopal/Anglican priesthood.
Actually, I beleive the best marketing strategies the TEC should do to convert people and attract the unchurched and non-Christians are to return to the Scriptures, repent, return to orthdoxy, and consult with all the Churches within the Anglican communion before making drastic decisions like gay ordinations and blessing of same sex marriage. The Church should be counter-cultural, instead of flowing/joining with this individualistic/hedonistic culture, if it wants to make a mark or statement in today's world. Christians should be in the world but not of this world. We should be salt of the earth and light of the world.
I believe that the church
I believe that the church will have some counter cultural elements to it. However, supporting gay marriage is, in fact, quite counter culture. It is counter promiscuous culture; and counter to cultures who hid sexuality.
The litany of "returning to the scriptures" and "returning to orthodoxy," isn't quite compelling to millions of people because they are more like slogans than terms of engagement. Most people don't even know what scriptures are. Would we start, for example, with Leviticus? what if they were to interpret the genesis story literally? And what does repentance mean? Is it a command to stop shaving?
I have no problem with making a statement or mark, being "in" but not "of" or being "salt." But these are metaphors, and are made concrete through real work, not by sloganeering.
You know what happens every
You know what happens every time I hear an Anglican/Episcopalian person comment with surprise that a Latin@ has chosen the Anglican/Episcopal Church?
I wince and wonder what the heck you all think of me--- token brown girl? Checkbox filled in? Final diversity card collected, woo hoo? "We didn't know. You don't look/talk/seem Hispanic"?
There's a whole bunch of us in the Episcopal Church. Quit acting so flaming surprised.
HI Mary Sue, I'm not going
HI Mary Sue,
I'm not going to please everyone with the rhetoric. This is a think piece asking: why is this important?
Do you think that Cutie's conversion isn't interesting? I know there is a huge Episcopal Cuban church, but for most Latinos (and Irish. And Polish) Catholicism is part of one's ethnic identity. Is that of any import? Or do you disagree and would argue that Catholicism ISN't important to most Latinos.
And do you honestly think that the Episcopal church has done a satisfactory job of inculcating Latinos in the church? Perhaps we have. I'm not so sure - although there are notable exceptions. Your disappointment with me seems to imply that I'm correct.
As a priest who has worked in two Hispanic Churches, and is brown myself, I can understand your frustration. I admit, when I hear that Chicken Tikka Masala is the national dish of England, I'm amused, even though that is one of the blandest Indian dishes one could have used.
But I think you miss the central point: capitalism has unmoored ethnicity and religion. It's happened for 500 years, and this is yet another example.
I'm perfectly aware that there are no universals. There are Assyrians in Iran, Protestants in Spain and Waldensians in Italy. Admittedly, I don't pay attention to them.
Anyway, I apologize if the flip tone bothered you.
Hey, we Texas Episcopalians
Hey, we Texas Episcopalians have been eating rice and beans and drinking Mojitos for a long, long time!